{"id":30240,"date":"2024-10-09T10:38:34","date_gmt":"2024-10-09T15:38:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/breakingintowallstreet.com\/?post_type=biws_kb&#038;p=30240"},"modified":"2025-08-20T18:52:49","modified_gmt":"2025-08-20T23:52:49","slug":"valuation-multiples","status":"publish","type":"biws_kb","link":"https:\/\/breakingintowallstreet.com\/kb\/valuation\/valuation-multiples\/","title":{"rendered":"Valuation Multiples: Full Tutorial, Example Calculations, and Interpretation"},"content":{"rendered":"<blockquote><p><strong>Valuation Multiples Definition:<\/strong> A valuation multiple equals a company\u2019s Equity Value (Market Cap) or Enterprise Value divided by a financial or operational metric, such as Revenue, EBITDA, or Monthly Active Users; valuation multiples tell you how cheap or expensive a company is in relation to similar companies.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The easiest real-life analogy here is to <strong>real estate<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>Suppose that you\u2019re thinking about buying two homes: One that costs $200K and one that costs $500K.<\/p>\n<p>If both homes are the same size, such as 3,000 square feet, and they\u2019re similar in all other respects, this is easy: The $500K one is more expensive.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone wp-image-30241 size-full\" title=\"Valuation Multiples and Homes\" src=\"https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/09103437\/01-Valuation-Multiples-Homes.jpg\" alt=\"Valuation Multiples and Homes\" width=\"2381\" height=\"505\" srcset=\"https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/09103437\/01-Valuation-Multiples-Homes.jpg 2381w, https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/09103437\/01-Valuation-Multiples-Homes-300x64.jpg 300w, https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/09103437\/01-Valuation-Multiples-Homes-1024x217.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/09103437\/01-Valuation-Multiples-Homes-768x163.jpg 768w, https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/09103437\/01-Valuation-Multiples-Homes-1536x326.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/09103437\/01-Valuation-Multiples-Homes-2048x434.jpg 2048w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 2381px) 100vw, 2381px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>On a per-square-foot basis, the $500K house is $167 per square foot, and the $200K house is $67 per square foot.<\/p>\n<p>But now consider what happens if the houses are very different sizes:<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-30242 size-full\" title=\"Valuation Multiples and Homes of Different Sizes\" src=\"https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/09103506\/02-Valuation-Multiples-Homes-Different-Sizes.jpg\" alt=\"Valuation Multiples and Homes of Different Sizes\" width=\"2381\" height=\"639\" srcset=\"https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/09103506\/02-Valuation-Multiples-Homes-Different-Sizes.jpg 2381w, https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/09103506\/02-Valuation-Multiples-Homes-Different-Sizes-300x81.jpg 300w, https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/09103506\/02-Valuation-Multiples-Homes-Different-Sizes-1024x275.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/09103506\/02-Valuation-Multiples-Homes-Different-Sizes-768x206.jpg 768w, https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/09103506\/02-Valuation-Multiples-Homes-Different-Sizes-1536x412.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/09103506\/02-Valuation-Multiples-Homes-Different-Sizes-2048x550.jpg 2048w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 2381px) 100vw, 2381px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>The $500K house is still \u201ca higher price,\u201d but it is only $100 per square foot, while the $200K house is $200 per square foot.<\/p>\n<p>So, you get <strong>more for your money<\/strong> with the $500K house.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Valuation multiples do the same thing but for companies rather than homes.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>For example, if Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) Company A has an Enterprise Value of $800 million (what its core business is worth) and SaaS Company B has an Enterprise Value of $500 million, Company A might seem more expensive.<\/p>\n<p>But now let\u2019s say that Company A has Revenue of $200 million, while Company B has Revenue of $75 million.<\/p>\n<p>Company A\u2019s <strong>revenue multiple<\/strong> \u2013 a valuation multiple based on Enterprise Value \/ Revenue \u2013 is 4x, while Company B\u2019s is 6.7x.<\/p>\n<p>Therefore, <em>you pay more for each $1.00 of sales<\/em> if you invest in Company B.<\/p>\n<p>Is this higher multiple justified?<\/p>\n<p>We can\u2019t tell without knowing more about both companies.<\/p>\n<p><strong>People get valuation multiples wrong because they often stop here and say, \u201cCompany B is expensive!\u201d or \u201cCompany A is cheap!\u201d without understanding why.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>We need to look at each company\u2019s growth rate, margin, cash flow, <a href=\"https:\/\/breakingintowallstreet.com\/kb\/venture-capital\/saas-metrics\/\">SaaS metrics<\/a> (<a href=\"https:\/\/breakingintowallstreet.com\/kb\/venture-capital\/annual-recurring-revenue-arr\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">ARR<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/breakingintowallstreet.com\/kb\/venture-capital\/average-revenue-per-user\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">ARPU<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/breakingintowallstreet.com\/kb\/venture-capital\/rule-of-40\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Rule of 40<\/a>), markets, competition, and other qualitative attributes to say anything substantive.<\/p>\n<h3><strong>Files &amp; Resources:<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/youtube-breakingintowallstreet-com.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com\/107-31-Target-Calculations.xlsx\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Valuation Multiples \u2013 Example Calculations for Target (XL)<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/youtube-breakingintowallstreet-com.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com\/107-31-Valuation-Multiples-Slides.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Valuation Multiples \u2013 Slides (PDF)<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/youtube-breakingintowallstreet-com.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com\/107-31-Target-10-K.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Target \u2013 Highlighted 10-K (PDF)<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/youtube-breakingintowallstreet-com.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com\/107-31-Target-10-Q.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Target \u2013 Highlighted 10-Q (PDF)<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Video Table of Contents:<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>0:00:<\/strong> Introduction<\/li>\n<li><strong>0:44:<\/strong> The Short Version<\/li>\n<li><strong>4:42:<\/strong> Part 1: Example Valuation Multiples<\/li>\n<li><strong>7:20:<\/strong> Part 2: Example Multiple Calculations<\/li>\n<li><strong>10:59:<\/strong> Part 3: The Theory Behind Valuation Multiples<\/li>\n<li><strong>13:09:<\/strong> Part 4: Why the Theory Often Fails in Real Life<\/li>\n<li><strong>14:57:<\/strong> Recap and Summary<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2><strong>Examples of \u201cGeneralist\u201d Valuation Multiples<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p>First, there are the \u201cgeneralist\u201d valuation multiples that you see in nearly all industries:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Enterprise Value \/ Revenue:<\/strong> Indicates how valuable a company is in relation to its net sales.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Enterprise Value \/ EBITDA:<\/strong> Indicates how valuable a company is in relation to <a href=\"https:\/\/breakingintowallstreet.com\/kb\/accounting\/ebitda\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">a \u201crough proxy\u201d for its cash flow from core business operations<\/a>.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Equity Value \/ Net Income (P \/ E):<\/strong> Tells you how valuable a company is in relation to its after-tax profits, or \u201chow much you\u2019re paying\u201d for each $1.00 in after-tax profits.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>There are close variations as well, such as Enterprise Value \/ EBIT.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/breakingintowallstreet.com\/kb\/accounting\/ebit-operating-income\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">EBIT<\/a> is a company\u2019s Operating Income, sometimes with adjustments, but it does not add back the non-cash Depreciation &amp; Amortization expense.<\/p>\n<p>As a result, it partially factors in the company\u2019s <strong>capital costs<\/strong> (spending on factory, equipment, buildings, etc.), so the TEV \/ EBIT multiple reflects the company\u2019s spending on long-term assets more\u00a0than TEV \/ EBITDA.<\/p>\n<p>You can <strong>pair<\/strong> a financial or operational metric with <a href=\"https:\/\/mergersandinquisitions.com\/enterprise-value-vs-equity-value\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Enterprise Value vs. Equity Value<\/a> based on this simple test:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Does the metric <strong>deduct<\/strong> the company\u2019s Net Interest Expense? If so, it pairs with Equity Value (e.g., <a href=\"https:\/\/breakingintowallstreet.com\/kb\/accounting\/net-income\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Net Income<\/a>).<\/li>\n<li>OR does the metric <strong>represent<\/strong> just the common shareholders? If so, it pairs with Equity Value (e.g., <a href=\"https:\/\/breakingintowallstreet.com\/kb\/bank-modeling\/price-to-book-value\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Book Value<\/a>).<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>If <em>neither<\/em> of the above is true, then the metric pairs with Enterprise Value.<\/p>\n<p>For example, <a href=\"https:\/\/breakingintowallstreet.com\/kb\/accounting\/ebitda\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">EBITDA<\/a> does <strong>not<\/strong> deduct a company\u2019s Net Interest Expense, and it represents <em>all<\/em> the investors in the company.<\/p>\n<p>Therefore, it always pairs with Enterprise Value.<\/p>\n<p>On the other hand, a metric like <a href=\"https:\/\/breakingintowallstreet.com\/kb\/financial-statement-analysis\/how-to-calculate-free-cash-flow\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Free Cash Flow<\/a> deducts the company\u2019s Net Interest Expense because it starts with Net Income, so it pairs with Equity Value.<\/p>\n<p>With other variants of Free Cash Flow, such as <a href=\"https:\/\/breakingintowallstreet.com\/kb\/valuation\/levered-free-cash-flow\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Levered Free Cash Flow (LFCF)<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/breakingintowallstreet.com\/kb\/discounted-cash-flow-analysis-dcf\/unlevered-free-cash-flow\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Unlevered Free Cash Flow (UFCF)<\/a>, you can ask the same question:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>LFCF:<\/strong> Deducts the Net Interest Expense, so it pairs with Equity Value.<\/li>\n<li><strong>UFCF:<\/strong> Does <strong>not<\/strong> deduct the Net Interest Expense and represents all investors, so it pairs with Enterprise Value (TEV \/ UFCF).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2><strong>Industry-Specific Valuation Multiples<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p>In addition to these \u201cgeneralist\u201d valuation multiples, there are also industry-specific versions.<\/p>\n<p>We don\u2019t have the space here to explain these fully, but we will link to some relevant articles below:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Commercial Banks and Insurance Firms:<\/strong> Common multiples include <a href=\"https:\/\/breakingintowallstreet.com\/kb\/bank-modeling\/price-to-book-value\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Price to Book Value (P \/ BV)<\/a>, based on Equity Value \/ Book Value, and variants like P \/ TBV, which uses Tangible Book Value instead. The P \/ E multiple is also much more important here. (More: <a href=\"https:\/\/mergersandinquisitions.com\/financial-institutions-groups\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">The Financial Institutions Group in investment banking<\/a>).<\/li>\n<li><strong>Natural Resources:<\/strong> You will see multiples like Enterprise Value \/ Proved Reserves, Enterprise Value \/ Daily Production, and Enterprise Value \/ Mineral-Equivalent Reserves because these operational metrics are all very important for oil, gas, and mining companies (see: <a href=\"https:\/\/mergersandinquisitions.com\/oil-gas-investment-banking-group\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">oil &amp; gas investment banking<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/mergersandinquisitions.com\/metals-mining-investment-banking-group\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">metals &amp; mining investment banking<\/a>).<\/li>\n<li><strong>REITs:<\/strong> <a href=\"https:\/\/breakingintowallstreet.com\/kb\/reit-modeling\/funds-from-operations-ffo\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Funds from Operations (FFO)<\/a> and Adjusted Funds from Operations (AFFO) are used instead of Net Income; the multiples are Equity Value \/ FFO and Equity Value \/ AFFO (see: <a href=\"https:\/\/mergersandinquisitions.com\/real-estate-investment-banking-group\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">real estate investment banking<\/a>).<\/li>\n<li><strong>Power &amp; Utilities:<\/strong> You\u2019ll see metrics based on key operational metrics, such as the \u201cRate Base\u201d and the total power production capacity in Gigawatts (GW) or Megawatts (MW). The relevant multiples are TEV \/ RB and $ per MW or $ per GW for the capacity-based ones (see: <a href=\"https:\/\/mergersandinquisitions.com\/power-utilities-investment-banking\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">power &amp; utilities investment banking<\/a>).<\/li>\n<li><strong>Technology \/ Social Media \/ SaaS:<\/strong> In these sectors, metrics like the Monthly Active Users, <a href=\"https:\/\/breakingintowallstreet.com\/kb\/venture-capital\/annual-recurring-revenue-arr\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR)<\/a>, and <a href=\"https:\/\/breakingintowallstreet.com\/kb\/venture-capital\/average-revenue-per-user\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Average Revenue per User (ARPU)<\/a> are very important, so you\u2019ll see multiples such as TEV \/ MAU and TEV \/ ARR (see: <a href=\"https:\/\/mergersandinquisitions.com\/technology-investment-banking-group\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">technology investment banking<\/a>).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2><strong>Valuation Multiples: Example Calculations<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p>To illustrate how a simple calculation works, let\u2019s return to the <a href=\"https:\/\/breakingintowallstreet.com\/kb\/accounting\/ebitda\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">EBITDA tutorial<\/a>, which was based on companies like Target and Best Buy.<\/p>\n<p>We\u2019ll take Target as an example and calculate its <strong>LTM EBITDA multiple<\/strong> in 2 steps:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Calculate its EBITDA based on Operating Income + Depreciation &amp; Amortization on the Cash Flow Statement + add-backs for any non-recurring charges.<\/li>\n<li>Calculate its Enterprise Value based on its Equity Value \u2013 Cash + Debt +\/- other items in the <a href=\"https:\/\/breakingintowallstreet.com\/kb\/equity-value-enterprise-value\/how-to-calculate-enterprise-value\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Enterprise Value bridge<\/a>.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>Here\u2019s Step 1 for Target, based on its annual and quarterly report:<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-30243 size-full\" title=\"Target - LTM EBITDA Multiple\" src=\"https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/09103542\/03-Target-LTM-EBITDA-Multiple.jpg\" alt=\"Target - LTM EBITDA Multiple\" width=\"1711\" height=\"492\" srcset=\"https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/09103542\/03-Target-LTM-EBITDA-Multiple.jpg 1711w, https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/09103542\/03-Target-LTM-EBITDA-Multiple-300x86.jpg 300w, https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/09103542\/03-Target-LTM-EBITDA-Multiple-1024x294.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/09103542\/03-Target-LTM-EBITDA-Multiple-768x221.jpg 768w, https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/09103542\/03-Target-LTM-EBITDA-Multiple-1536x442.jpg 1536w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1711px) 100vw, 1711px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>We\u2019re calculating the Last Twelve Months or LTM figures for the company here to get the most recent data as of the valuation date.<\/p>\n<p>We do this by taking the annual numbers, adding the most recent 6-month period, and subtracting the same 6-month period from the previous year.<\/p>\n<p>Then, in Step 2, we calculate the Enterprise Value by multiplying the company\u2019s diluted share count by its share price as of the valuation date, subtracting Cash, and adding Debt.<\/p>\n<p>These numbers come from public sources like Google Finance and the company\u2019s quarterly filing:<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-30244 size-full\" title=\"Target - Enterprise Value Calculation\" src=\"https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/09103601\/04-Target-Enterprise-Value.jpg\" alt=\"Target - Enterprise Value Calculation\" width=\"905\" height=\"371\" srcset=\"https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/09103601\/04-Target-Enterprise-Value.jpg 905w, https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/09103601\/04-Target-Enterprise-Value-300x123.jpg 300w, https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/09103601\/04-Target-Enterprise-Value-768x315.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 905px) 100vw, 905px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>This produces the following valuation multiples for Target:<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-30245 size-full\" title=\"Target - Valuation Multiples\" src=\"https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/09103623\/05-Target-Valuation-Multiples.jpg\" alt=\"Target - Valuation Multiples\" width=\"893\" height=\"276\" srcset=\"https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/09103623\/05-Target-Valuation-Multiples.jpg 893w, https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/09103623\/05-Target-Valuation-Multiples-300x93.jpg 300w, https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/09103623\/05-Target-Valuation-Multiples-768x237.jpg 768w, https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/09103623\/05-Target-Valuation-Multiples-325x100.jpg 325w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 893px) 100vw, 893px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>If we compare Target to other U.S.-based retailers with over $10 billion in revenue, we get the following results for the valuation multiples:<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-30246 size-full\" title=\"Target - Public Comps\" src=\"https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/09103721\/06-Target-Public-Comps.jpg\" alt=\"Target - Public Comps\" width=\"2531\" height=\"642\" srcset=\"https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/09103721\/06-Target-Public-Comps.jpg 2531w, https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/09103721\/06-Target-Public-Comps-300x76.jpg 300w, https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/09103721\/06-Target-Public-Comps-1024x260.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/09103721\/06-Target-Public-Comps-768x195.jpg 768w, https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/09103721\/06-Target-Public-Comps-1536x390.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/09103721\/06-Target-Public-Comps-2048x519.jpg 2048w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 2531px) 100vw, 2531px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>So, is Target expensive or cheap relative to its <a href=\"https:\/\/breakingintowallstreet.com\/kb\/valuation\/comparable-company-analysis-cca\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">comparable companies<\/a>?<\/p>\n<p>Based on this quick screen, we\u2019d say, \u201cNeither \u2013 it seems about appropriately priced.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>It has lower revenue growth than the public comps and similar EBITDA margins, which implies that its EBITDA is probably growing more slowly.<\/p>\n<p>But it is also trading at lower EBITDA multiples than the medians of the set, which seems appropriate for its lower growth.<\/p>\n<p><strong>The real answer, though, is that this is not a great set of comparable companies because the 5 companies here are <em>much<\/em> different sizes<\/strong> \u2013 it\u2019s effectively <em>two<\/em> sets of comps for \u201cbigger retailers\u201d (Costco and Walmart) and \u201csmaller retailers\u201d (Dollar Tree and Dollar General).<\/p>\n<div class='code-block code-block-2' style='margin: 8px 0; clear: both;'>\n<div class=\"kb-adinsert-modal\">\n    <div class=\"kb-adinsert-top\">\n      <div class=\"media\">\n          <img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-28448\" src=\"https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/24164120\/adv-fm-tile.png\" alt=\"PowerPoint Pro\" width=\"128\" height=\"128\" \/>\n      <\/div>\n      <div class=\"content\">\n          <h3>Master Financial Modeling for Investment Banking With <strong>BIWS Core Financial Modeling<\/strong><\/h3>\n      <\/div>\n    <\/div>\n    \n    <div class=\"full_text\">\n    \t<ul>\n        \t<li>\n            \t<h4>Become a financial modeling pro<\/h4>\n              <p>158 videos, detailed written guides, Excel files, quizzes, and more<\/p>\n\t\t\t    <\/li>\n          <li>\n          \t<h4>Complete 10+ detailed global case studies<\/h4>\n            <p>These include both the theory and the practical applications<\/p>\n\t\t\t    <\/li>\n          <li>\n          \t<h4>Prepare for your internship or full-time job<\/h4>\n            <p>Gain the skills you need to \u201chit the ground running\u201d on Day 1\n\n<\/p>\n\t\t\t  <\/li>\n      <\/ul>\n        \n      <a class=\"cta-link orange-button-medium\" href=\"https:\/\/breakingintowallstreet.com\/core-financial-modeling\/\" target=\"_blank\">Full Details<\/a>\n      \n      <a class=\"cta-link orange-button-medium bg-blue\" href=\"https:\/\/biws-support.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com\/Course-Outlines\/Core-Financial-Modeling-Course-Outline.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Short Outline<\/a>\n    <\/div>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n<h2><strong>The Theory Behind Valuation Multiples<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p>In theory, you can write any valuation multiple formulaically based on the company\u2019s <a href=\"https:\/\/breakingintowallstreet.com\/kb\/financial-statement-analysis\/roic-return-on-invested-capital\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)<\/a> for Enterprise Value-based multiples or <a href=\"https:\/\/breakingintowallstreet.com\/kb\/financial-statement-analysis\/return-on-equity-roe\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Return on Equity (ROE)<\/a> for Equity Value-based multiples.<\/p>\n<p>For example, you can write the Enterprise Value \/ EBIT multiple like this:<\/p>\n<p><strong>TEV \/ EBIT<\/strong> = (ROIC \u2013 EBIT Growth Rate) \/ (ROIC * (WACC \u2013 EBIT Growth Rate)) * (1 \u2013 Tax Rate)<\/p>\n<p>In other words, if a company\u2019s ROIC is higher, meaning it is more \u201cefficient\u201d at generating profits based on its Invested Capital, its TEV \/ EBIT multiple should be higher.<\/p>\n<p>If its ROIC is lower, meaning it is less efficient, its TEV \/ EBIT multiple should be lower.<\/p>\n<p>The same applies to the EBIT Growth Rate: Higher growth means a higher multiple and lower growth means a lower multiple.<\/p>\n<p>If the company\u2019s <a href=\"https:\/\/mergersandinquisitions.com\/wacc-formula\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">WACC<\/a> (a measure of risk and potential returns) is higher, the multiple should be lower to reflect the additional risk.<\/p>\n<p>You can write similar formulas for all the valuation multiples, and on an intuitive level, they are correct.<\/p>\n<p><strong>The problem is that all these formulas assume that the company\u2019s attributes, such as its ROIC, WACC, and Growth Rate, stay constant and that the company has reached a \u201cstabilized\u201d state.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>But this is rarely true for companies in real life, which is one reason why these formulas rarely match reality.<\/p>\n<p>Companies grow and change over time, and while they may eventually reach a \u201cstabilized\u201d state, it could take years or decades to get there, depending on the industry.<\/p>\n<h2><strong>Theory Meets Reality: Why Valuation Multiples Do Not Always Mean Much in Real Life<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p>Besides the often incorrect \u201cstabilization\u201d assumption, many other issues could distort these numbers.<\/p>\n<p>One common problem is that <strong>the set of comparable companies may not be quite so \u201ccomparable,\u201d<\/strong> as in the example above:<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-30247 size-full\" title=\"Target - Mismatched Public Comps\" src=\"https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/09103751\/07-Mismatched-Public-Comps.jpg\" alt=\"Target - Mismatched Public Comps\" width=\"2531\" height=\"641\" srcset=\"https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/09103751\/07-Mismatched-Public-Comps.jpg 2531w, https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/09103751\/07-Mismatched-Public-Comps-300x76.jpg 300w, https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/09103751\/07-Mismatched-Public-Comps-1024x259.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/09103751\/07-Mismatched-Public-Comps-768x195.jpg 768w, https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/09103751\/07-Mismatched-Public-Comps-1536x389.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/09103751\/07-Mismatched-Public-Comps-2048x519.jpg 2048w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 2531px) 100vw, 2531px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Dollar General and Dollar Tree are much smaller than Target, but Target is much smaller than Costco and Walmart \u2013 and there\u2019s a huge valuation divergence between these groupings.<\/p>\n<p>All this group of comps says is, \u201cBig retailers trade at higher multiples than small retailers,\u201d which is a bit of a silly and anticlimactic conclusion.<\/p>\n<p>Another issue is that valuation multiples mostly reflect a company\u2019s <strong>short-term expectations and recent history<\/strong>, so they do not capture the 10 or 20-year outlook.<\/p>\n<p>If a company has a bad quarter, the stock market tends to overreact by punishing its share price, even if the long-term picture remains positive.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Accounting differences<\/strong> can also cause many issues, especially after IFRS 16 went into effect in 2019.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/mergersandinquisitions.com\/lease-accounting\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">The new lease accounting rules<\/a> mean that U.S. and non-U.S. companies record leases quite differently on their statements, so metrics like EBITDA and EBIT may not be directly comparable unless you adjust them.<\/p>\n<p>For all these reasons, you should never take a specific set of valuation multiples too seriously.<\/p>\n<p>They mean the most if you compar<em>e very similar companies<\/em> in the same geography with similar revenue, growth rates, and margins.<\/p>\n<h2><strong>How to Use Valuation Multiples Successfully<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p>It\u2019s best to think about valuation multiples like <strong>blood tests<\/strong> or other health exams when you see the doctor.<\/p>\n<p>If you go in for an annual physical, and your cholesterol or blood pressure is too high, this single test doesn\u2019t necessarily mean you have a problem.<\/p>\n<p>It just means that you may want to <strong>dig deeper<\/strong> and see if any other exams or analyses point to potential problems with your health.<\/p>\n<p>Valuation multiples work the same way: They\u2019re indications that a company <em>might<\/em> be overvalued or undervalued and that you may want to do further research to assess it.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cFurther research\u201d means reading about the industry, understanding the company\u2019s role, reviewing its historical reports and presentations, and building your own <a href=\"https:\/\/mergersandinquisitions.com\/financial-modeling\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">financial model<\/a> and valuation.<\/p>\n<p>Valuation multiples are useful supporting tools, but they\u2019re no substitute for a rigorous <a href=\"https:\/\/mergersandinquisitions.com\/dcf-model\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">DCF model<\/a> built on well-researched long-term assumptions for a company.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A valuation multiple equals a company\u2019s Equity Value (Market Cap) or Enterprise Value divided by a financial or operational metric, such as Revenue, EBITDA, or Monthly Active Users; valuation multiples tell you how cheap or expensive a company is in relation to similar companies.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","class_list":["post-30240","biws_kb","type-biws_kb","status-publish","hentry","kb_category-valuation"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/breakingintowallstreet.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/biws_kb\/30240","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/breakingintowallstreet.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/biws_kb"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/breakingintowallstreet.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/biws_kb"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/breakingintowallstreet.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=30240"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}