{"id":24119,"date":"2021-11-22T11:07:26","date_gmt":"2021-11-22T16:07:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/breakingintowallstreet.com\/?post_type=biws_kb&#038;p=24119"},"modified":"2025-08-20T18:53:26","modified_gmt":"2025-08-20T23:53:26","slug":"precedent-transaction-analysis","status":"publish","type":"biws_kb","link":"https:\/\/breakingintowallstreet.com\/kb\/valuation\/precedent-transaction-analysis\/","title":{"rendered":"Precedent Transaction Analysis: Video Tutorial With Excel Examples"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><div id=\"ez-toc-container\" class=\"ez-toc-v2_0_81 counter-flat ez-toc-counter ez-toc-grey ez-toc-container-direction\">\n<div class=\"ez-toc-title-container\">\n<p class=\"ez-toc-title\" style=\"cursor:inherit\">Precedent Transaction Analysis: Video Tutorial With Excel Examples<\/p>\n<span class=\"ez-toc-title-toggle\"><\/span><\/div>\n<nav><ul class='ez-toc-list ez-toc-list-level-1 ' ><li class='ez-toc-page-1'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-1\" href=\"https:\/\/breakingintowallstreet.com\/kb\/valuation\/precedent-transaction-analysis\/#What_is_Precedent_Transaction_Analysis_and_Is_Precedent_Transaction_Analysis_the_Same_as_Comparable_Company_Analysis\">What is Precedent Transaction Analysis, and Is Precedent Transaction Analysis the Same as Comparable Company Analysis?<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-2\" href=\"https:\/\/breakingintowallstreet.com\/kb\/valuation\/precedent-transaction-analysis\/#Precedent_Transaction_Analysis_Examples_in_Excel_XLS\">Precedent Transaction Analysis Examples in Excel (XLS)<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-3\" href=\"https:\/\/breakingintowallstreet.com\/kb\/valuation\/precedent-transaction-analysis\/#The_Rationale_for_Precedent_Transaction_Analysis_and_its_Drawbacks\">The Rationale for Precedent Transaction Analysis (and its Drawbacks)<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-4\" href=\"https:\/\/breakingintowallstreet.com\/kb\/valuation\/precedent-transaction-analysis\/#How_to_Do_a_Precedent_Transaction_Analysis_Manually\">How to Do a Precedent Transaction Analysis Manually<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-5\" href=\"https:\/\/breakingintowallstreet.com\/kb\/valuation\/precedent-transaction-analysis\/#The_Trade-Offs_and_Disadvantages_of_the_Precedent_Transaction_Analysis\">The Trade-Offs and Disadvantages of the Precedent Transaction Analysis<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/nav><\/div>\n<br \/>\nThe <strong>Precedent Transaction Analysis<\/strong>, along with <a href=\"https:\/\/breakingintowallstreet.com\/kb\/valuation\/comparable-company-analysis-cca\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Comparable Company Analysis<\/a> and the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.mergersandinquisitions.com\/dcf-model\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">DCF Model<\/a>, is one of the \u201cBig Three\u201d valuation methodologies.<\/p>\n<p>Of these three methodologies, it is also the most \u201coptional\u201d or \u201csupplemental\u201d one.<\/p>\n<p>If you don\u2019t have access to an expensive subscription service like Capital IQ or FactSet, it isn&#8217;t easy to find precedent transactions and gather the required data.<\/p>\n<p>And even if you do have these services and perfect access to all the data, the analysis itself tends to produce more random results with a wider range of values than the other methodologies.<\/p>\n<p>That said, you still need to know about the Precedent Transaction Analysis for interviews, case studies, and the job itself, so let\u2019s start at the beginning:<\/p>\n<div class='code-block code-block-2' style='margin: 8px 0; clear: both;'>\n<div class=\"kb-adinsert-modal\">\n    <div class=\"kb-adinsert-top\">\n      <div class=\"media\">\n          <img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-28448\" src=\"https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/24164120\/adv-fm-tile.png\" alt=\"PowerPoint Pro\" width=\"128\" height=\"128\" \/>\n      <\/div>\n      <div class=\"content\">\n          <h3>Master Financial Modeling for Investment Banking With <strong>BIWS Core Financial Modeling<\/strong><\/h3>\n      <\/div>\n    <\/div>\n    \n    <div class=\"full_text\">\n    \t<ul>\n        \t<li>\n            \t<h4>Become a financial modeling pro<\/h4>\n              <p>158 videos, detailed written guides, Excel files, quizzes, and more<\/p>\n\t\t\t    <\/li>\n          <li>\n          \t<h4>Complete 10+ detailed global case studies<\/h4>\n            <p>These include both the theory and the practical applications<\/p>\n\t\t\t    <\/li>\n          <li>\n          \t<h4>Prepare for your internship or full-time job<\/h4>\n            <p>Gain the skills you need to \u201chit the ground running\u201d on Day 1\n\n<\/p>\n\t\t\t  <\/li>\n      <\/ul>\n        \n      <a class=\"cta-link orange-button-medium\" href=\"https:\/\/breakingintowallstreet.com\/core-financial-modeling\/\" target=\"_blank\">Full Details<\/a>\n      \n      <a class=\"cta-link orange-button-medium bg-blue\" href=\"https:\/\/biws-support.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com\/Course-Outlines\/Core-Financial-Modeling-Course-Outline.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Short Outline<\/a>\n    <\/div>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"What_is_Precedent_Transaction_Analysis_and_Is_Precedent_Transaction_Analysis_the_Same_as_Comparable_Company_Analysis\"><\/span><strong>What is Precedent Transaction Analysis, and Is Precedent Transaction Analysis the Same as Comparable Company Analysis?<\/strong><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>These two methodologies are <strong>related but different<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>In a <a href=\"https:\/\/breakingintowallstreet.com\/kb\/valuation\/comparable-company-analysis-cca\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Comparable Company Analysis<\/a>, you find publicly traded companies similar to the company you\u2019re valuing, and you estimate your company\u2019s value based on theirs.<\/p>\n<p>For example, maybe your company\u2019s <a href=\"https:\/\/breakingintowallstreet.com\/kb\/equity-value-enterprise-value\/how-to-calculate-enterprise-value\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Enterprise Value<\/a> is currently $2,500, and it has Revenue of $1,000 and <a href=\"https:\/\/breakingintowallstreet.com\/kb\/accounting\/ebitda\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">EBITDA<\/a> of $200 for TEV \/ Revenue and TEV \/ EBITDA multiples of 2.5x and 12.5x, respectively.<\/p>\n<p>Similar public companies trade at Revenue multiples of 2x and EBITDA multiples of 10x.<\/p>\n<p>Therefore, since these other similar companies trade at <strong>lower multiples<\/strong>, your company may be <strong>overvalued<\/strong> currently.<\/p>\n<p>Precedent Transaction Analysis is different because it\u2019s based on <strong>companies that have been acquired<\/strong> rather than public companies that are still trading on the stock market.<\/p>\n<p>For example, maybe you find a set of 10 similar, recent transactions in the industry of the company you\u2019re valuing.<\/p>\n<p>The acquirers in these transactions paid TEV \/ Revenue multiples between 2x and 3x and TEV \/ EBITDA multiples between 8x and 14x.<\/p>\n<p>Since your company has Revenue of $1,000 and EBITDA of $200, its implied Enterprise Value based on Precedent Transactions is:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Implied Value from Revenue Multiples:<\/strong> $2,000 \u2013 $3,000<\/li>\n<li><strong>Implied Value from EBITDA Multiple:<\/strong> $1,600 \u2013 $2,800<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Since the company\u2019s Enterprise Value is currently $2,500, which is <strong>right in the middle of these ranges<\/strong>, we\u2019d say it\u2019s \u201cappropriately valued.\u201d<\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Precedent_Transaction_Analysis_Examples_in_Excel_XLS\"><\/span><strong>Precedent Transaction Analysis Examples in Excel (XLS)<\/strong><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>You can get a few real examples of Precedent Transactions for different industries (steel manufacturing and biotech\/pharmaceuticals) below:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/youtube-breakingintowallstreet-com.s3.amazonaws.com\/107-27-STLD-Precedent-Transactions.xlsx\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" data-schema-attribute=\"\">Steel Dynamics &#8211; Precedent Transaction Analysis and Valuation Summary<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/youtube-breakingintowallstreet-com.s3.amazonaws.com\/107-27-JAZZ-Precedent-Transactions.xlsx\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" data-schema-attribute=\"\">Jazz Pharmaceuticals &#8211; Precedent Transaction Analysis<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/youtube-breakingintowallstreet-com.s3.amazonaws.com\/107-27-Precedent-Transaction-Analysis-Slides.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" data-schema-attribute=\"\">Precedent Transaction Analysis &#8211; Slide Summary (PDF)<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Here\u2019s the Steel Dynamics example:<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone wp-image-24120 size-full\" title=\"Steel Dynamics - Precedent Transaction Analysis\" src=\"https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/19075052\/01-STLD-Transactions.jpg\" alt=\"Precedent Transaction Analysis - Steel Dynamics\" width=\"1483\" height=\"640\" srcset=\"https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/19075052\/01-STLD-Transactions.jpg 1483w, https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/19075052\/01-STLD-Transactions-300x129.jpg 300w, https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/19075052\/01-STLD-Transactions-1024x442.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/19075052\/01-STLD-Transactions-768x331.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1483px) 100vw, 1483px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>And here\u2019s the Jazz Pharmaceuticals example:<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone wp-image-24121 size-full\" title=\"Jazz Pharmaceuticals - Precedent Transaction Analysis\" src=\"https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/19075051\/02-JAZZ-Transactions.jpg\" alt=\"Jazz Pharmaceuticals - Precedent Transaction Analysis\" width=\"1213\" height=\"722\" srcset=\"https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/19075051\/02-JAZZ-Transactions.jpg 1213w, https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/19075051\/02-JAZZ-Transactions-300x179.jpg 300w, https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/19075051\/02-JAZZ-Transactions-1024x610.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/19075051\/02-JAZZ-Transactions-768x457.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1213px) 100vw, 1213px\" \/><\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"The_Rationale_for_Precedent_Transaction_Analysis_and_its_Drawbacks\"><\/span><strong>The Rationale for Precedent Transaction Analysis (and its Drawbacks)<\/strong><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>In theory, the Precedent Transaction Analysis should be more \u201cgrounded in reality\u201d than the DCF Model or even the Comparable Company Analysis because it\u2019s based on what <strong>companies have paid in real life for other companies<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>In a DCF model, you could use ridiculous assumptions to get any output you want: maybe the company grows at 20% per year forever, or it goes from unprofitable to 30% profit margins in 2 years.<\/p>\n<p>In other words, garbage in, garbage out.<\/p>\n<p>But you can\u2019t manipulate the data in the same way with Precedent Transactions because they\u2019re based on <strong>historical records<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>That said, the methodology does have some disadvantages.<\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s difficult and time-consuming to use without access to a paid database service like Capital IQ, it\u2019s challenging to find deals that are truly \u201ccomparable,\u201d and it tends to produce higher and more \u201crandom\u201d values than the other valuation methodologies.<\/p>\n<p>To value a company with Precedent Transactions, follow these steps:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Find\/select an appropriate set of transactions.<\/li>\n<li>Determine the metrics and multiples you want to use.<\/li>\n<li>Calculate the multiples for all the transactions.<\/li>\n<li>Apply the median or 25th\/75th percentile multiples from the set to your company to estimate its Implied Equity Value and Enterprise Value (and Implied Share Price if your company is public).<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<h3><strong>Step 1: Find Precedent Transactions<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p>The <strong>best<\/strong> option here is to use a service like Capital IQ, which lets you screen for Precedent Transactions based on financial, geographic, and industry criteria, as well as <strong>time<\/strong>:<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-24122 size-full aligncenter\" title=\"Capital IQ Screen for Precedent Transactions\" src=\"https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/19075050\/03-Capital-IQ-Screen.jpg\" alt=\"Capital IQ Screen for Precedent Transactions\" width=\"1128\" height=\"271\" srcset=\"https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/19075050\/03-Capital-IQ-Screen.jpg 1128w, https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/19075050\/03-Capital-IQ-Screen-300x72.jpg 300w, https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/19075050\/03-Capital-IQ-Screen-1024x246.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/19075050\/03-Capital-IQ-Screen-768x185.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1128px) 100vw, 1128px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>These criteria are always based on the <strong>Target company<\/strong>; the Acquirer\u2019s financial profile doesn\u2019t matter.<\/p>\n<p>There are no universal or hard-and-fast rules on the screening criteria, so you should base them on <strong>the number of reasonably comparable deals you can find<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>For example, if your initial criteria are:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Geography:<\/strong> France<\/li>\n<li><strong>Financial:<\/strong> Revenue above \u20ac1 billion<\/li>\n<li><strong>Industry:<\/strong> Chemicals<\/li>\n<li><strong>Dates:<\/strong> Past 3 years<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>And these criteria produce only 2 transactions, you need to make them broader.<\/p>\n<p>You could do this by expanding the geography to \u201cEurope\u201d or \u201cWestern Europe\u201d or going back 5-10 years rather than 3.<\/p>\n<p>If one of these expansions produces 10 or 15 comparable transactions, you can stop there.<\/p>\n<p>Ideally, you want <strong>at least<\/strong> <strong>5-10 deals<\/strong> in the set, but probably not 30 or 50 deals.<\/p>\n<p>A good upper limit might be <strong>~20 transactions<\/strong>; if you go beyond that, many of the acquired companies will not be similar to the one you\u2019re valuing.<\/p>\n<p>As with Comparable Companies, you screen the deals like this because you want the acquired companies in the set to have similar <strong>risk\/potential return profiles<\/strong> (i.e., similar <a href=\"https:\/\/www.mergersandinquisitions.com\/wacc-formula\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Discount Rates<\/a>).<\/p>\n<p>If you do <strong>not<\/strong> have access to Capital IQ, FactSet, PrivCo, or other paid services, your best option is to find a recent deal in the sector, look for its Fairness Opinion, and see if that document includes a list of Precedent Transactions.<\/p>\n<p>For example, if we\u2019re valuing a steel company in the U.S., we could look up the name of a recent deal and limit the search to the sec.gov site, as follows:<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-24123 size-full\" title=\"Fairness Opinion Search\" src=\"https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/19075050\/04-Fairness-Opinion-Search.jpg\" alt=\"Fairness Opinion Search\" width=\"723\" height=\"436\" srcset=\"https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/19075050\/04-Fairness-Opinion-Search.jpg 723w, https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/19075050\/04-Fairness-Opinion-Search-300x181.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 723px) 100vw, 723px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>The first result takes us to an SEC document with a Fairness Opinion provided by Moelis, which includes this set of Precedent Transactions:<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-24124 size-full\" title=\"Moelis - Precedent Transaction Analysis\" src=\"https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/19075049\/05-Moelis-Precedent-Transaction-Analysis.jpg\" alt=\"Moelis - Precedent Transaction Analysis\" width=\"756\" height=\"479\" srcset=\"https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/19075049\/05-Moelis-Precedent-Transaction-Analysis.jpg 756w, https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/19075049\/05-Moelis-Precedent-Transaction-Analysis-300x190.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 756px) 100vw, 756px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>We did not use this set because the target companies were global, and we prefer stricter geographic screens.<\/p>\n<p>If you can\u2019t find Fairness Opinions for recent deals, another option is to search for M&amp;A reports for a specific industry, such as by Googling terms like: \u201c[Industry Name] M&amp;A reports multiples\u201d<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-24125 size-full\" title=\"Manually Searching for Precedent Transactions\" src=\"https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/19075049\/06-Biotech-MA-Reports-Multiples.jpg\" alt=\"Manually Searching for Precedent Transactions\" width=\"698\" height=\"557\" srcset=\"https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/19075049\/06-Biotech-MA-Reports-Multiples.jpg 698w, https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/19075049\/06-Biotech-MA-Reports-Multiples-300x239.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 698px) 100vw, 698px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>You should <strong>not<\/strong> spend much time on this exercise if you don\u2019t have a paid data service.<\/p>\n<p>If you can find a few deals or average\/median multiples in 1 hour, great, but don\u2019t spend hours or days searching for transactions when the DCF and Public Comps are easier and more useful.<\/p>\n<h3><strong>Step 2: Pick the Metrics and Multiples to Include in a Precedent Transaction Analysis and Calculate Everything<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p>As with Comparable Company Analysis, you want a mix of sales-based and profitability-based metrics, but you tend to focus on <strong>historical metrics and multiples<\/strong> here.<\/p>\n<p>So, while you might find the <a href=\"https:\/\/breakingintowallstreet.com\/kb\/finance\/last-twelve-months-ltm\/\">Last Twelve Months (LTM)<\/a> numbers and the projections over the next 1-2 years for the Public Comps, you would probably retrieve only the LTM numbers for the Precedent Transactions.<\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s difficult to find <em>historical projections<\/em> for acquired companies, and there may be consistency issues because it\u2019s not always clear if these projections include <strong>expected synergies<\/strong> from the deal.<\/p>\n<p>A good target might be the LTM Revenue and LTM EBITDA for each company, which you can combine with the Transaction Enterprise Value to calculate the <a href=\"https:\/\/breakingintowallstreet.com\/kb\/valuation\/valuation-multiples\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">valuation multiples<\/a>:<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-24126 size-full\" title=\"Valuation Multiples in Precedent Transactions\" src=\"https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/19075048\/07-Precedent-Transaction-Multiples.jpg\" alt=\"Valuation Multiples in Precedent Transactions\" width=\"1486\" height=\"643\" srcset=\"https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/19075048\/07-Precedent-Transaction-Multiples.jpg 1486w, https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/19075048\/07-Precedent-Transaction-Multiples-300x130.jpg 300w, https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/19075048\/07-Precedent-Transaction-Multiples-1024x443.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/19075048\/07-Precedent-Transaction-Multiples-768x332.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1486px) 100vw, 1486px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>If you\u2019re working in a specialized industry with different multiples, such as P \/ BV and P \/ E for banks or P \/ FFO and P \/ AFFO for REITs, you can also use those.<\/p>\n<p>You could also add <strong>premiums<\/strong> for the acquired public companies that represent the offer price per share vs. the target\u2019s pre-deal share price.<\/p>\n<p>For example, if the Buyer paid $150 per share, and the Seller traded at $100 per share before the deal, that\u2019s a 50% premium.<\/p>\n<p>You could go back 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, or even use a 12-month average or a volume-weighted average price (VWAP) over a period to calculate these premiums.<\/p>\n<p>We did this in the Jazz Pharmaceuticals valuation because we had the share price data for each acquired company:<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-24127 size-full\" title=\"Valuation Multiples and Premiums in Precedent Transactions\" src=\"https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/19075048\/08-Precedent-Transaction-Premiums.jpg\" alt=\"Valuation Multiples and Premiums in Precedent Transactions\" width=\"1213\" height=\"732\" srcset=\"https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/19075048\/08-Precedent-Transaction-Premiums.jpg 1213w, https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/19075048\/08-Precedent-Transaction-Premiums-300x181.jpg 300w, https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/19075048\/08-Precedent-Transaction-Premiums-1024x618.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/19075048\/08-Precedent-Transaction-Premiums-768x463.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1213px) 100vw, 1213px\" \/><\/p>\n<p><strong>Premiums<\/strong> are not that useful because they\u2019re <em>always<\/em> going to tell you that your company is worth more than its current share price (or recent average).<\/p>\n<p>Unlike the valuation multiples and DCF, premiums cannot indicate that a company is currently <em>overvalued<\/em>, so they\u2019re mostly used to support the specific offer price.<\/p>\n<h3><strong>Step 3: Apply the Multiples or Premiums to Value the Company<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p>You apply the median, 25<sup>th<\/sup> percentile, or 75<sup>th<\/sup> percentile multiples to your company\u2019s financial stats to calculate its Implied Enterprise Value.<\/p>\n<p>Then, you back into Implied Equity Value and the Implied Share Price to get a valuation range.<\/p>\n<p>For example, we use this process with the Precedent Transaction EBITDA Multiples for Steel Dynamics:<\/p>\n<p><strong>Step 1:<\/strong> The company\u2019s LTM EBITDA is $2.3 billion, and the 25<sup>th<\/sup> to 75<sup>th<\/sup> percentile multiples are 8.0x to 12.9x.<\/p>\n<p>Therefore, the company\u2019s Implied Enterprise Value is $18.5 billion to $30.1 billion.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Step 2:<\/strong> We <em>add<\/em> Cash and other non-core assets and <em>subtract<\/em> Debt and other funding sources to back into the Implied Equity Value.<\/p>\n<p>For Steel Dynamics, we add around $1.1 billion of Cash and $25 million in NOLs and subtract $3.4 billion in Debt and $10 million in Noncontrolling Interests.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Step 3:<\/strong> Then, we divide the Implied Equity Value numbers by the company\u2019s diluted share count, which is 211 million here.<\/p>\n<p>Here\u2019s the Excel formula for Steps 2 and 3 once we have the Implied Enterprise Values in Step 1:<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-24128 size-full\" title=\"Calculating the Implied Share Price in Precedent Transactions\" src=\"https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/19075047\/09-Precedent-Transactions-Implied-Share-Price.jpg\" alt=\"Calculating the Implied Share Price in Precedent Transactions\" width=\"1282\" height=\"465\" srcset=\"https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/19075047\/09-Precedent-Transactions-Implied-Share-Price.jpg 1282w, https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/19075047\/09-Precedent-Transactions-Implied-Share-Price-300x109.jpg 300w, https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/19075047\/09-Precedent-Transactions-Implied-Share-Price-1024x371.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/19075047\/09-Precedent-Transactions-Implied-Share-Price-768x279.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1282px) 100vw, 1282px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Finally, we can plot the results on the <a href=\"https:\/\/breakingintowallstreet.com\/kb\/excel\/football-field-valuation\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">football field valuation chart<\/a>:<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-24129 size-full\" title=\"Valuation - Football Field Chart with Precedent Transaction Analysis\" src=\"https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/19075047\/10-Precedent-Transaction-Analysis-Football-Field-Chart.jpg\" alt=\"Valuation - Football Field Chart with Precedent Transaction Analysis\" width=\"1249\" height=\"621\" srcset=\"https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/19075047\/10-Precedent-Transaction-Analysis-Football-Field-Chart.jpg 1249w, https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/19075047\/10-Precedent-Transaction-Analysis-Football-Field-Chart-300x149.jpg 300w, https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/19075047\/10-Precedent-Transaction-Analysis-Football-Field-Chart-1024x509.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/19075047\/10-Precedent-Transaction-Analysis-Football-Field-Chart-768x382.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1249px) 100vw, 1249px\" \/><\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"How_to_Do_a_Precedent_Transaction_Analysis_Manually\"><\/span><strong>How to Do a Precedent Transaction Analysis Manually<\/strong><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>In most cases, you rely on metrics and multiples from sources such as Capital IQ and Fairness Opinions in a Precedent Transaction Analysis.<\/p>\n<p>But if you want, you could analyze the transactions <strong>manually<\/strong> and calculate the multiples for each one by yourself.<\/p>\n<p><strong>This manual approach is almost always a bad idea because it takes a huge amount of time and does not necessarily improve the results<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>Unless you need to do this because your full-time job requires it, it\u2019s complete overkill for interviews and case studies.<\/p>\n<p>If you want to do a manual analysis, you\u2019ll need the following documents:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Deal Press Release(s)<\/strong> <a href=\"https:\/\/youtube-breakingintowallstreet-com.s3.amazonaws.com\/107-27-ALXN-Deal-Press-Release.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" data-schema-attribute=\"\">with the Offer Price per Share<\/a>.<\/li>\n<li><strong>The Acquired Company\u2019s<\/strong> most recent <a href=\"https:\/\/youtube-breakingintowallstreet-com.s3.amazonaws.com\/107-27-ALXN-10-K.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" data-schema-attribute=\"\">annual<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/youtube-breakingintowallstreet-com.s3.amazonaws.com\/107-27-ALXN-10-Q.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" data-schema-attribute=\"\">interim reports<\/a> as of the deal announcement date.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Other Deal Documents<\/strong>, such as the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.mergersandinquisitions.com\/definitive-agreement-mergers-acquisitions\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">definitive agreement<\/a> or the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.mergersandinquisitions.com\/investment-banking-fairness-opinions\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Fairness Opinion<\/a> for the deal, if you can find it.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Once you have all this, you calculate the Transaction Equity Value and Enterprise Value for the acquired company based on the Offer Price per Share and its Balance Sheet right before the announcement, as in <a href=\"https:\/\/youtube-breakingintowallstreet-com.s3.amazonaws.com\/107-27-ALXN-MA-Comp.xlsx\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" data-schema-attribute=\"\">the example for AstraZeneca \/ Alexion Pharmaceuticals below<\/a>:<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-24130 size-full\" title=\"Calculating the Purchase Enterprise Value in a Precedent Transaction Analysis\" src=\"https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/19075046\/11-Precedent-Transaction-Transaction-Enterprise-Value.jpg\" alt=\"Calculating the Purchase Enterprise Value in a Precedent Transaction Analysis\" width=\"632\" height=\"661\" srcset=\"https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/19075046\/11-Precedent-Transaction-Transaction-Enterprise-Value.jpg 632w, https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/19075046\/11-Precedent-Transaction-Transaction-Enterprise-Value-287x300.jpg 287w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 632px) 100vw, 632px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Then, you calculate metrics such as the target company\u2019s LTM EBITDA and Revenue based on their financial statements, including adjustments for non-recurring charges:<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-24131 size-full\" title=\"Non-Recurring Charges and the EBITDA Calculation in a Precedent Transaction Analysis\" src=\"https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/19075045\/12-Precedent-Transaction-Non-Recurring-Charges.jpg\" alt=\"Non-Recurring Charges and the EBITDA Calculation in a Precedent Transaction Analysis\" width=\"661\" height=\"490\" srcset=\"https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/19075045\/12-Precedent-Transaction-Non-Recurring-Charges.jpg 661w, https:\/\/biwsuploads-assest.s3.amazonaws.com\/biws\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/19075045\/12-Precedent-Transaction-Non-Recurring-Charges-300x222.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 661px) 100vw, 661px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>If you include premiums and projected numbers, you\u2019ll have to spend time finding the data for those as well.<\/p>\n<p>The <strong>bottom line<\/strong> is that doing this analysis manually creates a ton of extra work but rarely adds anything useful.<\/p>\n<p>The metrics and multiples may be <em>a bit<\/em> more accurate, but you\u2019ll be spending hours or days getting results that are ~1-5% better.<\/p>\n<p>Finally, if some of the target companies in the set are <strong>private<\/strong>, good luck.<\/p>\n<p>Private companies do not disclose their financial statements, so you\u2019ll rely on press releases, deal announcements, and random Google searches, which means an Excel setup like the one above is impossible anyway.<\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"The_Trade-Offs_and_Disadvantages_of_the_Precedent_Transaction_Analysis\"><\/span><strong>The Trade-Offs and Disadvantages of the Precedent Transaction Analysis<\/strong><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>Most textbooks, valuation guides, and Interview Guides say that Precedent Transactions tend to produce \u201chigher valuations\u201d than the Public Comps due to the <strong>control premium<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>The <strong>control premium<\/strong> refers to how the Acquirer must pay a premium on top of the Target\u2019s share price if it wants to move into a control position (i.e., own &gt;= 50% of the shares).<\/p>\n<p>For example, if a Target trades at $100 per share, why would it accept an offer to sell the entire company for $100 per share?<\/p>\n<p>Shareholders could sell their shares individually for that price; they need a greater incentive to sell <em>all their shares at once<\/em> and give up all future upside in the Target.<\/p>\n<p>However, <strong>reality<\/strong> doesn\u2019t quite match the theory here because it\u2019s more accurate to say that the Precedent Transactions produce a <strong>wider range<\/strong> of implied values than the other methodologies.<\/p>\n<p>You can see this clearly if you look at the Steel Dynamics \u201cfootball field\u201d chart above.<\/p>\n<p>This happens because companies do deals for <strong>different reasons<\/strong>, at <strong>different times<\/strong>, and in <strong>different market environments<\/strong> \u2013 and sometimes the <strong>data<\/strong> is wrong or incomplete.<\/p>\n<p>So, if you look at deals from the past ~10 years, the valuation multiples might shift significantly over that time.<\/p>\n<p>But if you limit your set to deals done in the past 1-2 years in an attempt to make them \u201ccomparable,\u201d you may not find enough relevant transactions!<\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s a bit of a Catch-22, in which fixing or improving the analysis creates other problems.<\/p>\n<p>The <strong>bottom line<\/strong> is that Precedent Transactions take more time and resources to find than Public Comps and often require access to a paid service like Capital IQ.<\/p>\n<p>They don\u2019t necessarily produce \u201cbetter\u201d results \u2013 just more variable ones \u2013 and you don\u2019t need them for anything else in the analysis, such as the calculation of the Discount Rate.<\/p>\n<p>Therefore, we view the Precedent Transaction Analysis as \u201csupplemental\u201d \u2013 it\u2019s fine if you have the data, but don\u2019t go crazy with it if you do not have a quick and easy way to find deals.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In this tutorial, you&#8217;ll learn about the Precedent Transaction Analysis, when it&#8217;s useful, how to conduct one using automated and manual data sources, and some of the disadvantages of this methodology.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","class_list":["post-24119","biws_kb","type-biws_kb","status-publish","hentry","kb_category-valuation"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/breakingintowallstreet.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/biws_kb\/24119","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/breakingintowallstreet.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/biws_kb"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/breakingintowallstreet.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/biws_kb"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/breakingintowallstreet.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=24119"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}